++ Announcement (23.09.2025) ++ Revoke of permission for the free use of my Calculators and Designs and IP

Featured

Posted on by

Unfortunately, I no longer see any way to continue making my intellectual property available free of charge. After more than five years of giving so much to the community, my own benefit is not even close to zero, but far into the negative.

For this reason, I hereby revoke permission for the free use of all spreadsheet horn calculators and designs provided by me anywhere and, overall, the use of my intellectual property with immediate effect as of 23.09.2025!

For those who have already downloaded my calculators in the past (there have been thousands of downloads already!), I expect at least that you make a donation if you want to continue using them to support my work and to keep this blog alive. Otherwise, please delete all the corresponding files that are related to my intellectual property. Keeping any copies is not permitted. Please contact me by email if you would like to continue using my work to discuss conditions.

If you would like to use my calculators and designs in the future to build your own horns, please feel free to contact me by email. A license must now be purchased in order to manufacture any horn loudspeakers based on my intellectual property. In this case, please contact me by email and just shortly describe your project, and we can discuss conditions.

If you have already built any horn speakers based on my work, I would really appreciate it if you consider making a donation. Please also contact me by email in this case.

If you simply enjoy reading my blog and would like to support my work, please consider supporting me with a donation by contacting me via email to discuss the details.

Any commercial use of my intellectual property for the software, results, designs, CAD files, or documentation provided here remain strictly prohibited! But I am open for discussion about special conditions.

Round Acoustic Loading Horns (JMLC, SWH, Traktrix, etc.) – the Trumpets of Jericho?

Posted on by

Sometimes a slightly provocative headline is necessary to attract attention. Please don’t take it too seriously. But it should be well known that the origin of my activities regarding horn development was dissatisfaction with these types of horns. Personally, I just couldn’t live with the fact that these horns consistently focus the sound extremely narrowly (beaming). There is more or less a very small sweet spot where you can experience the full spectrum of the music. If you move away from the sweet spot, the sound image collapse very quickly. What I have also noticed repeatedly as a negative aspect is that the on-axis listening experience is often very direct, tiring, or even annoying in the high-frequency range. As always, perception is subjective, and it may well be that there are people who explicitly like this. It is important to me to emphasize that I am not claiming that my opinion is the only valid one. Nevertheless, in this article, I would like to describe and also demonstrate with help of a BEM simulation why I have come to this conclusion and why I consider these horn types to be obsolete. Continue reading →

The Mysterious World of the Karlson Tube

Posted on by

I have been interested in Karlson speakers for quite some time. I find their use as Karlson tubes in combination with compression drivers particularly exciting, even though the applications I’ve found on the web seem mysterious, and make me wonder how they actually work technically.

It is well known that a native tube with a length of 1/4 of the desired cut-off wave length, open at one end, exhibits a strong fundamental resonance plus higher odd harmonics. To show this as reference, I have created a BEM model for a 25cm native tube with a 1.4in driver membrane which gives the tube’s radiation impedance:

half open tube (25cm)  radiation impedance.

I had to increase the scale as otherwise the peaks were cut away. Following the Karlson theory, if a slot is added to the tube, ideally opening exponentially over its length, the strong resonance of the native tube should be largely smoothed out, resulting in broadband radiation. The slot itself should extend over at least 2/3 of the length of the tube.

For the BEM simulation, I first had to consider how to simulate such a slot in the tube. After some attempts, I ended up obtained meaningful results with the following model when the interface represents the cut-out surface. In other words, the tube with slot and the interface together form the complete initial tube without slot.

Karlson tube with exponential slot.

Interface.

Complete BEM model.

For the exterior domain, the driver, and tube mesh files could be re-used with lower resolution. The cut-off frequency was set to 525 Hz and T=1.

Karlson tube (25cm) radiation impedance.

Be aware of the changed scale, the resonances are greatly reduced. Very interesting results! We can now further reduce the length of the tube by fixing the cut-off frequency.

Karlson tube (16cm. 1/4 cut-off wave length) radiation impedance.

Karlson tube (11.5cm) radiation impedance.

All models used constant velocity drive, so the radiation impedances look fine with respect to acoustic loading. Even the shortest tube has good acoustic loading down to 2k Hz. This opens up new possibilities for variation in terms of cut-off frequency and tube length if you want to adapt and optimize the design for your own purposes. And not just only for compression drivers, but also for subwoofers, if necessary.

An exciting question was if the cut-off impedance peak could be further smoothed by preserving the length of the tube. As my current calculator has the length of the tube fixed as input parameter is a bit counterintuitive but by settings T=0 the start slot width becomes wider:

Karlson tube (16cm. 1/4 cut-off wave length)  with T=0.

The resulting radiation impedance is indeed more smoothed, with a lower peak at cut-off:

Karlson tube (16cm. 1/4 cut-off wave length)  with T=0 radiation impedance.

At least for me these results are quite surprising as I would not have expected that such a large start slot width is still working reasonable well.

In many pictures that can be found on the web showing applications using a Karlson tube, it is noticeable that many setups angle the Karlson tube either upwards or downwards. This already suggests that the sound propagation is not centered on the axis of the tube, but is somehow angled. And here is the justification showing the BEM fields:

Vertical polar 2k5 Hz.

Vertical polar k5 Hz.

I have not measured the angle exactly, but it seems to be around 30-40 degrees in this case. Despite the interesting results, it should be noted that these are devices that strongly beam at high frequencies:

Vertical polar.

Horizontal polar.

For me personally, studying Karlson tubes was very worthwhile, as I was able to develop the skills to simulate this design with BEM and then adapt the model for other applications based on the idea of this design.